Papernews

Newsletter from Meri      NEW INSTALLATIONS  -  TECHNOLOGY UPDATES  -  REBUILDS

Papernews

Effluent Treatment Plant Addition at Liberty Paper Inc. in Becker, Minnesota

Going Green in the Land of 10,000 Lakes

Voith Meri Environmental Solutions, Inc. is helping to set higher standards for wastewater treatment with the addition of the Effluent Treatment Plant at Liberty Paper Incorporated in Becker, Minnesota.

Liberty Paper Inc.

Liberty Paper (LPI) is located in the state of Minnesota in the Midwest of the United States. The state is known as “Land of 10,000 lakes” due to the tremen¬dous amount of lakes dispersed all around the state. LPI is a state-of-the-art paper mill that recycles old corrugated containers into new paper for packaging. The mill manufactures recycled paper from more than 200,000 tons of old corrugated containers each year. As part of the Liberty Diversified International (LDI) family, LPI is extremely involved in their community.

Liberty Paper’s (LPI) need for this facility was sparked by their steady growth and desire to maximize production. When Meri and LPI began negotiations for an effluent treatment plant (ETP), the local water treatment facility had reached its capacity and LPI had outgrown the wastewater infrastructure, which was provided by the municipality. Either the city had to upgrade their operations to treat the increased CBOD load or the burden had to be taken off the city.
LPI’s original intent was to do a complete design. A project including engineering, procurement and construction, a complete turn-key project approach.  As they got further into the project development they discovered the potential cost-saving through a unique partnership with Meri. LPI started to consider playing the role of general contractor but they needed a partner that would be more than just a vendor. A partner to take a leadership role, therefore removing some of the risk from LPI. LPI had never approached a project quite like they approached this one. Larry Newell, LPI Vice-President Manufacturing, explains, “I think it was more of a custom-approach to this project, it was more of a risk for us, more of a risk for Meri as well, and the outcome was very good. The outcome was one that I would replicate again. I think it was a very good way to approach a project.“ Tom Murphy, ETP Manager at LPI, agrees, “We like things managed as a one-stop-shop. We don’t want five companies with their hands in it – we want to be able to go directly to one company – Meri. No matter what the problem was, Meri was always willing to deal with it. I think I’ve learned this year that a single vendor in charge of a project is vital to success.“


Chuck Legatt, LPI Mill Manager, preferred the low-risk approach, “We’re a single mill operation. We needed to build up a pretty high level of confidence in the Meri team that they could deliver to the expectations of the mill. We’re a unique company, somewhat risk adverse...we would have been the first effluent treatment plant of its kind installed in the United States by the Meri Group, so we had to build up a high level of confidence in the Meri team in order to be able to partner up with them. And the fact that they stuck with us, staying engaged and trying to meet our needs as we refined our scope, that was pretty valuable in developing that relationship. I know that the mill and Meri invested a lot of energy into trying to get a scope that we all could agree with and that could meet all of our needs.“

 

The Start-Up Phase

The waste water was introduced to the ETP on December 3rd, 2012, about two weeks ahead of schedule. Chuck Legatt described the process: “There was a lot of risk in meeting that commitment with construction starting in the spring and being able to start up in the winter and still be able to hit that mark. And the start-up phase, I think went well, I think we were staffed well and we had good technical resources in the Meri team that was here with ours. In fact, the start-up was a bit of a non-event.“

Papernews


Meri’s Advanced Anaerobic Effluent
Treatment Technology at a Glance

Anaerobic processes are used for the treatment of highly loaded effluents. Anaerobic bacteria in the form of biopellets are used for the conversion of dissolved COD in to methane (biogas). In the paper industry anaerobic technology is mainly used in board and packaging mills.

Cooling Tower
Cooling Tower
Reduces the temperature from mill effluent in order to meet the requirements of the succeeding biological process steps
Pre-Acidification
Pre-Acidification
This stage balances volume and load and serves as an initial step for further anaerobic degradation.
R2S ANAEROBIC REACTOR
R2S ANAEROBIC REACTOR
(5.9 m in diameter and 24 m tall) Effectively degrades dissolved organic waste materials in an extremely small environment with a minimal space requirement
Biogas Flare
Biogas Flare
Safe and reliable treatment of biogas. This process step helps to reduce odor, can remove some of the remaining COD and triggers the precipitation of calcium.
Sludge Dewatering
Sludge Dewatering
Centrifuge and/or belt press
DAF: LIME TRAP
DAF: LIME TRAP®
The elimination of calcium in the process effluent with the LIME TRAP® enables an optimized operation of succeeding aerobic equipment.







Samples of the treated waste water are carefully
monitored at regular intervals

Advantages of Anaerobic
Effluent Treatment Technology

Anaerobic treatment of waste water has found a perfect application in industrial waste water treatment, especially in applications with high COD concentrations. Compared with aerobic treatment, the main advantages of anaerobic treatment could be summarized as: reduced footprint, lower energy consumption and minimum sludge production.

Reduced Footprint
Among the different anaerobic reactor technologies available, the R2S Reactor achieves volumetric loads as high as 25 kg COD/m3/day. Considering that the required tank size for most conventional activated sludge systems is 1.5 kg COD/m3/day, the R2S has a definite advantage. One other important consideration is the fact that the R2S is up to 30 m in height, which significantly reduces the footprint required for effluent treatment plants.

Lower Energy Consumption
Aerobic treatment requires oxygen to oxidize the organic compounds. This oxygen is introduced into the system by means of blowers and other devices that have a high-energy consumption. A system designed to treat 10,000 kg COD/day, for example, would require 15 MWh per day. On the other hand, each kilogram of COD treated in an anaerobic system yields 2.4 kWh – a difference of 39 MWh per day!

Minimum Sludge Production
Aerobic treatment yields a large amount of biological sludge that needs to be removed from the system and dewatered or stabilized in order to optimize sludge disposal costs. Depending on the system, up to 60% of the converted COD will be converted to new sludge. This number contrasts with the average sludge growth observed in anaerobic systems of 2% to 5%.

Left: Anaerobic treatment plant dominated by the R2S Anaerobic Reactor. Right: LIME TRAP® for the removal of calcium carbonate.

The Current Situation in the United States

Paper mills in general, including OCC mills like LPI, require large amounts of water and therefore require a large waste water facility to cope with the high COD and calcium levels typically found in this application. The state-of-the-art R2S Reactor design allows for continuous and efficient removal of calcified biomass.
LPI produces around 750 sTon per day, the COD discharge is 9,700 kg COD per day. The ETP system that Meri designed utilizes a cooling stage followed by a pre-acidification tank and the R2S Anaerobic Reactor. The process continues with a CO2 stripping reactor, which facilitates hydrogen sulfide conversion for odor reduction and calcium carbonate precipitation. The last step is a LIME TRAP® for calcium carbonate and solids removal as well as a centrifuge decanter for sludge thickening.

 

In Conclusion

The effluent treatment plant has proven to be robust and efficient since the start-up. With an average soluble COD removal greater than 90% and 98% for BOD5, the plant reduces the COD from the average 9,700 kg COD/day to 863 kg per day.